Ask
Interrogate the governed matter using natural-language questions and review the source material behind the response.
Source-linked AI for litigation
AI that works inside the matter — with the evidence attached.
LegalRAG Pro brings AI into documents, evidence, chronology, people, issues, tasks, drafts and reports. Ask bounded questions, run governed investigations and test propositions against source material while keeping the lawyer in control of what is accepted.
Arrange a synthetic-matter walkthrough. No client material is needed.
What the AI does
AI is a working capability across the product.
The product is not simply a document store with an AI chat box added to it. AI-assisted work can operate across the connected matter, with the evidential route and professional boundary kept visible.
Evidence analysis
Compare a proposition with material that supports, qualifies, contradicts or leaves it unresolved.
Chronology & sequence
Organise events and dates while preserving disagreement, approximation and documentary context.
People & knowledge
Follow individuals through communications, events and source material to investigate what they did, received or may have known.
Case Operator
Plan and run broader governed investigations from a defined objective or approved task, then review proposed work before acceptance.
Working output
Carry reviewed AI-assisted findings into tasks, working drafts and frozen report views without treating generated material as automatically approved.
Watch first
Choose the level of detail that suits you.
31-second teaser
A rapid first look at the proposition.
90-second overview
A concise introduction for senior legal teams.
Full flagship film
The 8:58 connected matter workflow now shown above.
Authentic synthetic product evidence
Follow a finding back to the document.
The document inspection interface exposes capture and extraction status, underlying page text and technical provenance. These screens show what can be inspected; a status label does not prove that a legal proposition is correct.
Finance
Keep financial analysis inside the governed matter.
Historical financials, comparables, deterministic calculations, evidence bindings, limitations, exact traceability and exports sit alongside the legal record rather than in an ungoverned side calculation.
The AI does not do the arithmetic.
Core Finance maths is deterministic, and Finance AI is constrained to frozen authority. It cannot silently recalculate, invent missing values or change the recorded analytical status.
Explore Finance →A connected view of contentious work.
Evidence and chronology
Work from documentary material to events and their supporting sources, while preserving uncertainty and disputed accounts.
Issues and people
Consider evidence in the context of the people involved and the issues that matter to the dispute.
Investigation and review
Develop propositions, inspect supporting and contradictory material, and decide what needs further work.
Worked synthetic matter
See how one contentious matter holds together.
The Eleanor Morgan synthetic employment dispute is now populated as a connected solicitor workspace: 40 source documents, four legal issues, 26 chronology events and 43 frozen evidence citations, with eight matter tasks and four saved working drafts that remain explicitly not approved for reliance.
Case state
40 documents · 4 issues
Different issues can remain disputed, unresolved or evidence incomplete rather than being forced into one answer.
Evidence structure
26 events · 43 citations
The frozen report keeps chronology and source-linked evidence available for inspection.
Next work
8 tasks · 4 working drafts
Gaps can become explicit next actions, while draft status stays separate from professional approval.
Case Operator · governed AI investigation
Run multi-step AI investigations from a defined objective.
Case Operator is the broader AI working mode: it plans and runs governed case work from an approved matter task or defined investigation objective, while keeping scope, returned work and professional acceptance explicit.
- Establish the task and its prerequisites.
- Understand the scope of the investigation.
- Inspect returned work and source context.
- Make an explicit professional decision.
The image shows the prerequisite gate in a synthetic matter. It is evidence of that interface state, not proof of the complete run.
Test the complete sequence in a scoped pilot →
AI work stays separate until you decide what belongs in the case.
The product is designed to keep the AI-assisted finding, professional decision and resulting matter assessment distinguishable. Source linkage does not remove the need to check context, competing evidence or legal significance.
Examine the professional control model →Explore by workflow
Start with the legal work you need to organise.
These focused guides explain how LegalRAG Pro approaches common evidence-heavy litigation workflows.
Legal AI for litigation
Investigate evidence, chronology, contradictions and gaps while keeping professional review visible.
AI-assisted litigation document review
Turn document review into reusable matter knowledge rather than another disconnected inbox.
AI case chronology software
Build a chronology that stays connected to the documents and issues behind each event.
Evidence analysis for solicitors
Map what supports, qualifies or contradicts a proposition and return to the underlying source.
Next step
Walk through the product on a synthetic matter.
Start with a practitioner walkthrough using a synthetic matter. Then decide whether a scoped pilot fits your team.