Practitioner workflows
LegalRAG Pro is not a collection of disconnected screens. These films show the working journey from source documents and evidential questions through investigation, supervised work and professional decision.
Synthetic demonstration material. No client information is shown. Matter Attention is clearly marked as a development preview.
75-second overview
The best first view for partners, litigators and innovation leaders.
Central question: what happened, what supports it, what contradicts it, what remains uncertain, and what should happen next?
Complete practitioner route
Eight minutes of the broader journey across matter orientation, evidence, issues, chronology, source inspection, AI-assisted investigation, tasks, drafts, reports and professional review.
10 focused practitioner workflows
Each short film is approximately one to two minutes. The grouping follows the matter lifecycle rather than the application menu.
1:20
Establish the active matter boundary, working context and source corpus before downstream analysis begins.
Why it matters: A legal analysis is only as reliable as the matter boundary and material actually in scope.
1:09
Open the underlying document, inspect the page text and retain the route from working analysis back to the source.
Why it matters: A citation is a route to evidence, not a certificate that the interpretation is correct.
1:30
Test a proposition against supporting, qualifying and contradictory material, with gaps and uncertainty kept visible.
Why it matters: The useful result may be an unresolved conflict rather than a confident answer.
1:23
Connect events, dates, people and issues while preserving disputed or approximate positions and the underlying source route.
Why it matters: The chronology remains a working evidential view rather than an isolated timeline.
1:25
Frame the legal or factual issue, inspect supporting and adverse material, and keep generated findings separate from the adopted professional assessment.
Why it matters: Unresolved questions stay visible and become the basis for the next piece of work.
1:30
A development preview of how unresolved issues, contradictions, missing evidence and stale assessments may be surfaced for professional attention.
Why it matters: Development preview only — a dedicated Matter Attention register is not claimed as part of the adopted production baseline.
1:19
Ask a bounded question within the active matter, inspect supporting and contrary material, and return to the source before relying on the proposition.
Why it matters: Ask assists investigation; it is not an autonomous legal answer engine.
1:35
Start from an issue or defined objective, approve bounded work, inspect the evidence-linked result and decide the next action.
Why it matters: The run returns a governed state — COMPLETE, CONTINUE or BLOCKED — with the professional decision remaining explicit.
1:49
Turn an evidential gap into bounded work, carry the result into a draft or report, verify the source route and keep draft status distinct from approval.
Why it matters: Working material becomes relied-on work product only after professional review.
1:04
Follow a material financial figure through source basis, calculation route, assumptions and limitations, then return the finding to the legal matter.
Why it matters: Finance is the financial-evidence layer of the same matter, not a standalone answer.
Matter Attention
Earlier product films
These films provide different levels of product and governance context. The workflow series above is now the recommended route for understanding day-to-day practitioner use.
Professional decision
Use the reviewed work to advise the client, decide what evidence is needed, brief the team or counsel, prepare correspondence or pleadings, assess risk, support settlement strategy, or decide the next bounded piece of work.
Request a practitioner walkthrough