Authentication
The production service requires authenticated identity and controlled-user admission.
Governance
Legal AI governance should be visible in the work, not buried in a policy.
Legal AI governance for contentious work: explicit access boundaries, source provenance, professional review and controlled AI-assisted investigation inside each matter.
Governance as product behaviour
A policy document can say that AI must be supervised. A governed workspace should also make supervision practical: authenticated users, explicit matter membership, defined roles, source-linked evidence and visible review states.
LegalRAG Pro is designed so AI assists the work without silently becoming the authoritative case record.
Governed boundaries
Matter membership
Application access does not automatically confer access to every matter.
Roles
Matter owner, solicitor, reviewer and read-only roles separate access from mutation authority.
Evidence provenance
Source identity and evidence relationships are preserved for inspection.
Professional decision points
AI-assisted findings remain distinguishable from reviewed professional work.
Change history
Governed artefacts are designed to avoid silently overwriting prior analytical states.
Not a claim of autonomous legal judgment
LegalRAG Pro does not position the AI model as a solicitor, decision-maker or autonomous authority. The design goal is controlled assistance under professional supervision, with the lawyer retaining responsibility for legal judgment and client work.
Review governance in a pilot setting
Pilot access can be evaluated against your firm's own supervision, confidentiality and AI-use policies.