Capabilities and limitations

Know the retrieval boundary before relying on a result.

These descriptions are not guarantees that a given data format, integration or matter size has been independently verified.

A due-diligence matrix

AreaDescribed approachWhat a lawyer must check
Matter intakeOrganises matter documents and links them to the legal work.Check supported formats, scanned documents, OCR, attachments, duplicates, versioning, bulk intake and failure receipts.
Ask and source retrievalAnswers bounded questions with source evidence intended for human review.Verify eligibility and index coverage, unavailable documents, omitted material, error handling and false negatives.
Chronology and issuesConnects proposed events, issues and source material.Test uncertain or conflicting dates, incomplete events, corrections and export fidelity.
Document lineageSupports review of version relationships and read-only impact on downstream work.Test branching, wrong versions, provenance, approval boundaries and reversibility.
Case OperatorDescribes supervised investigations and proposed tasks.Test an entire unaided run, prerequisites, failure states, saved work and professional sign-off.
Drafts and reportsSeparates AI-assisted drafts from professional acceptance.Test approvals, citation survival, retrieval of past work, re-opening and export accuracy.
Legal researchLegal assertions must be source-checked before reliance.Identify which external authorities are licensed, current and actually available; distinguish them from matter evidence.
Integrations and scaleIntended for substantial documentary litigation.Obtain explicit import/export formats, integrations, supported matter sizes and observed performance under load.

The essential professional rule

Inspect the relevant passage and its context, not just the citation label. A claim of absence can only apply to the material actually searched. Professional judgement remains with the solicitor.

Professional governance · Trust and assurance limits.